OnTheIssuesLogo

Tom Udall on Corporations

Democratic Jr Senator; previously Representative (NM-3)

 


Opposes tax subsidies that favor large corporations

Udall spoke out against tax subsidies that favor large corporations and said more attention needs to be paid to small businesses. He also spoke out against the growing national deficit. Pearce echoed the call for lower taxes on small business and said there should be less regulation as well.
Source: [Xref Pearce] 2008 N.M. Senate Debate , Aug 22, 2008

Voted YES on allowing stockholder voting on executive compensation.

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to provide shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation [and as part of that process, fully disclosing executive compensation].

Proponents support voting YES because:

We should not deprive the public, the stockholders, from being able to do anything meaningful once they find out about scandalous levels of executive compensation or board compensation. Everyone talks about the corporate board as the remedy. But the board is often a part of the problem, being paid huge amounts of money for showing up once or twice a year at meetings.

Give the stockholders a meaningful remedy. Once you get the mandatory disclosure put in place by previous legislation, we are saying the stockholders should be allowed to have a referendum on that and not have a runaround by the board.

Opponents support voting NO because:

This vote is based on mischaracterization--it is an unnecessary amendment. The opportunity for these kinds of votes already exists within the structure of corporate governance right now. A good company from Georgia, AFLAC, went ahead and already has these nonbinding shareholder votes. But there is a difference between having individuals in the private sector, shareholders and individuals outside of the mandating of government to have it occur and have government come in with its heavy hand and say, this is exactly what you need to do because we know best. Our constituents know better how to act and how to relate to corporations than Washington.

Reference: Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation Act; Bill H R 1257 ; vote number 2007-244 on Apr 20, 2007

Voted NO on replacing illegal export tax breaks with $140B in new breaks.

Vote to pass a bill that would repeal an export tax break for U.S. manufacturers ruled an illegal trade subsidy by the World Trade Organization, while providing for about $140 billion in new corporate tax cuts. Revenue raising offsets would decrease the cost of the bill to $34.4 billion over 11 years. It would consist of a buyout for tobacco farmers that could not go over $9.6 billion. It also would allow the IRS to hire private collection agencies to get back money from taxpayers, and require individuals who claim a tax deduction for a charitable donation of a vehicle to obtain an independent appraisal of the car.
Reference: American Jobs Creation Act; Bill HR 4520 ; vote number 2004-259 on Jun 17, 2004

Voted NO on Bankruptcy Overhaul requiring partial debt repayment.

Vote to pass a bill that would make it easier for courts to change debtors from Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which allows most debts to be dismissed, to Chapter 13, which requires a repayment plan.
Reference: Bill sponsored by Gekas, R-PA; Bill HR 333 ; vote number 2001-25 on Mar 1, 2001

Rated 23% by the US COC, indicating an anti-business voting record.

Udall scores 23% by US Chamber of Commerce on business policy

Whether you own a business, represent one, lead a corporate office, or manage an association, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of AmericaSM provides you with a voice of experience and influence in Washington, D.C., and around the globe.

Our members include businesses of all sizes and sectors—from large Fortune 500 companies to home-based, one-person operations. In fact, 96% of our membership encompasses businesses with fewer than 100 employees.

Mission Statement:

"To advance human progress through an economic, political and social system based on individual freedom, incentive, initiative, opportunity, and responsibility."
The ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.
Source: COC website 03n-COC on Dec 31, 2003

Rated 86% by UFCW, indicating an anti-management/pro-labor record.

Udall scores 86% by UFCW on labor-management issues

The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) is North America's Neighborhood Union--1.3 million members with UFCW locals in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Canada. Our members work in supermarkets, drug stores, retail stores, meatpacking and meat processing plants, food processing plants, and manufacturing workers who make everything from fertilizer to shoes. We number over 60,000 strong with 25,000 workers in chemical production and 20,000 who work in garment and textile industries.

    The UFCW Senate scorecard is based on these key votes:
  1. American Jobs Act (+)
  2. Balanced Budget Amendment (-)
  3. Rejecting Cut, Cap, and Balance (+)
  4. Repeal Health Care Law (-)
  5. Sen. Am. 14 Wicker Am. to S 223, excluding unionization at TSA (-)
  6. Sen. Am. 740 McCain Am. to HR 2112, defunding TAA (-)
  7. Trade Adjustment Assistance Extension Act (TAA) (+)
Source: UFCW website 12-UFCW-S on May 2, 2012

Deregulating banks encourages discriminatory practices.

Udall voted NAY Banking Bill

Congressional Summary:

Supporting press release from Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN-6): This legislation will foster economic growth by providing relief to Main Street, tailor regulations for better efficacy, and most importantly it will empower individual Americans and give them more opportunity.

Opposing statement on ProPublica.org from Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY-5): The bill includes many provisions I support: minority-owned banks and credit unions in underserved communities have legitimate regulatory burden concerns. Unfortunately, exempting mortgage disclosures enacted to detect discriminatory practices will only assist the Trump Administration in its overall effort to curtail important civil rights regulations. I simply cannot vote for any proposal that would help this Administration chip away at laws that I and my colleagues worked so hard to enact and preserve.

Legislative outcome: Passed House 258-159-10 on May 22, 2018(Roll call 216); Passed Senate 67-31-2 on March 14, 2018(Roll call 54); Signed by President Trump. May 24, 2018

Source: Congressional vote 16-S2155 on Mar 14, 2018

Reducing tax rates balloons federal deficit & cuts programs.

Udall voted NAY Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Summary by GovTrack.US: (Nov 16, 2017)

Case for voting YES by Heritage Foundation (12/19/17):This is the most sweeping update to the US tax code in more than 30 years. The bill would lower taxes on businesses and individuals and unleash higher wages, more jobs, and untold opportunity through a larger and more dynamic economy. The bill includes many pro-growth features, including a deep reduction in the corporate tax rate, a scaled-back state and local tax deduction, full expensing for five years, and lower individual tax rates.

Case for voting NO by Sierra Club (11/16/17): Republicans have passed a deeply regressive tax plan that will result in painful cuts to core domestic programs, to give billionaires and corporate polluters tax cuts while making American families pay the price. Among the worst provisions:

  • This plan balloons the federal deficit by over $1.5 trillion. Cutting taxes for the rich now means cuts to the federal budget and entitlements later.
  • The bill hampers the booming clean energy economy by ending tax credits for the purchase of electric vehicles and for wind and solar energy.
  • The bill opens up the Arctic Refuge to drilling, a thinly veiled giveaway to the fossil fuel industry.

    Legislative outcome: Passed House, 224-201-7, roll call #699 on 12/20; passed Senate 51-48-1, roll call #323 on 12/20; signed by Pres. Trump on 12/22.

    Source: Congressional vote 17-HR1 on Nov 16, 2017

    Restrict corporate use of consumer mandatory arbitration.

    Udall signed restricting corporate use of consumer mandatory arbitration

    Excerpts from Letter from 35 Senators to the CFPB: We write to commend the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for its proposed rule to limit the use of mandatory, pre-dispute ("forced") arbitration clauses in consumer financial product and service contracts. Every day, Americans across the country are forced to sign away their constitutional right to access the courts as a condition of purchasing common products and services like credit cards, checking accounts, and private student loans. Binding arbitration is a privatized justice system that studies show consistently produces results that favor large corporations and offers no meaningful appeals process. As a result, consumers are left without redress, and companies are unaccountable for their unscrupulous behavior.

    Opposing freedom argument: (Cato Institute, "ATLA monopoly," May 2002): The trial lawyers new goal is to tighten their monopoly grip on the court system, and prevent the rest of us from choosing a more efficient means of resolving our disputes. Arbitration is simply private court. Lawyers with a vested interest in a monopoly court system are trying to stop the arbitration business from developing. But there's nothing forced or mandatory about it. Contracts are the result of choice. People should be free to choose for themselves what contracts to make and what rights to give up.

    Opposing economic argument: (Heritage Foundation, "The Unfair Attack on Arbitration," July 17, 2013): Any study by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau should examine whether a limit on arbitration would:

    Source: Letter to CFPB Director 17LTR-CFPB on Aug 4, 2016

    Other candidates on Corporations: Tom Udall on other issues:
    NM Gubernatorial:
    Deb Haaland
    Gary Johnson
    Gary King
    Jay Block
    Jeff Apodaca
    Joe Cervantes
    John Sanchez
    Michelle Lujan-Grisham
    Rebecca Dow
    Steve Pearce
    Susana Martinez
    NM Senatorial:
    Ben Ray Lujan
    Bob Walsh
    Gary Johnson
    Gavin Clarkson
    Maggie Toulouse Oliver
    Mark Ronchetti
    Martin Heinrich
    Mick Rich

    NM politicians
    NM Archives
    Senate races 2021-22:
    AK: Incumbent Lisa Murkowski(R)
    vs.Challenger Kelly Tshibaka(R)
    vs.2020 candidate Al Gross(D)
    AL: Incumbent Richard Shelby(R)
    vs.U.S. Rep. Mo Brooks(R)
    vs.Ambassador Lynda Blanchard(R)
    vs.Shelby staffer Katie Britt(R)
    vs.Judge Jessica Taylor(R)
    vs.Brandaun Dean(D)
    vs.State Rep. John Merrill(R)
    AR: Incumbent John Boozman(R)
    vs.Candidate Dan Whitfield(D)
    AZ: Incumbent Mark Kelly(D)
    vs.Sen. Kelli Ward(? R)
    vs.CEO Jim Lamon(R)
    vs.Challenger Blake Masters(R)
    vs.A.G. Mark Brnovich(R)
    CA: Incumbent Alex Padilla(D)
    vs.State Rep. Jerome Horton(D ?)
    vs.2018 Senate candidate James Bradley(R)
    vs.Candidate for San Diego city council 2020 Lily Zhou(R)
    CO: Incumbent Michael Bennet(D)
    vs.Eli Bremer(R)
    vs.USAF Lt. Darryl Glenn(R)
    CT: Incumbent Richard Blumenthal(D)
    vs.Challenger Joe Visconti(R)
    vs.2018 & 2020 House candidate John Flynn(R)
    FL: Incumbent Marco Rubio(R)
    vs.U.S.Rep. Val Demings(D)
    vs.U.S. Rep. Alan Grayson(D)
    GA: Incumbent Raphael Warnock(D)
    vs.Navy vet Latham Saddler(R)
    vs.Appointed Senator Kelly Loeffler(R ?)
    vs.Commissioner Gary Black(R)
    HI: Incumbent Brian Schatz(D)
    vs.Former State Rep. Cam Cavasso(R ?)
    IA: Incumbent Chuck Grassley(R)
    vs.State Sen. Jim Carlin(R)
    vs.U.S. Rep. Cindy Axne(D ?)
    vs.Former U.S. Rep IA-1 Abby Finkenauer(D)
    ID: Incumbent Mike Crapo(R)
    (no prospective opponents yet)
    IL: Incumbent Tammy Duckworth(D)
    vs.U.S.Rep. Adam Kinzinger(? R)
    IN: Incumbent Todd Young(R)
    vs.Challenger Haneefah Abdul-Khaaliq(D)
    vs.Psychologist Valerie McCray(D)
    KS: Incumbent Jerry Moran(R)
    vs.Secretary of State Mike Pompeo(? R)
    vs.2020 Congressional candidate Michael Soetaert(D)
    KY: Incumbent Rand Paul(R)
    vs.State Rep Charles Booker(D)
    LA: Incumbent John Kennedy(R)
    vs.Gov. John Bel Edwards(D ?)

    MD: Incumbent Chris Van Hollen(D)
    (no prospective opponents yet)
    MO: Incumbent Roy Blunt(R)
    vs.Gov. Eric Greitens(R)
    vs.State Sen. Scott Sifton(D)
    vs.Treasurer Eric Schmitt(R)
    vs.Marine Officer Lucas Kunce(D)
    vs.Attorney who waved gun at BLM protestors; 2020 GOP convention speaker Mark McClosky(R)
    vs.U.S. Rep. MO-4 Vicky Hartzler(R)
    vs.Challenger Tim Shepard(D)
    vs.U.S. Rep. MO-7 Billy Long(R)
    NC: Incumbent Richard Burr(R,retiring)
    vs.State Sen. Erica Smith(D)
    vs.U.S.Rep. Mark Walker(R)
    vs.Challenger Ted Budd(R)
    vs.Gov. Pat McCrory(R)
    vs.Justice Cheri Beasley(D)
    vs.Mayor of Beaufort Rett Newton(D)
    vs.State Sen.Jeff Jackson(D)
    ND: Incumbent John Hoeven(R)
    (no prospective opponents yet)
    NH: Incumbent Maggie Hassan(D)
    vs.Brig.Gen. Don Bolduc(R)
    vs.Gov. Chris Sununu(R ?)
    vs.Former Senator Kelly Ayotte(R ?)
    NV: Incumbent Catherine Cortez Masto(D)
    vs.NV Attorney General; Candidate for Governor 2018 Adam Laxalt(R)
    NY: Incumbent Chuck Schumer(D)
    vs.Challenger Antoine Tucker(R)
    OH: Incumbent Rob Portman(R,retiring)
    vs.Challenger Bernie Moreno(R)
    vs.U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan(D)
    vs.OH GOP Chair Jane Timken(R)
    vs.Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel(R)
    vs.Author JD Vance(R)
    vs.CEO Mike Gibbons(R)
    vs.Morgan Harper(D)
    OK: Incumbent James Lankford(R)
    (no prospective opponents yet)
    OR: Incumbent Ron Wyden(D)
    vs.QAnon adherent Jo Rae Perkins(R)
    vs.Jason Beebe(R)
    PA: Incumbent Pat Toomey(R,retiring)
    vs.HSBC whistleblower Everett Stern(R)
    vs.Lt.Gov.nominee Jeff Bartos(R)
    vs.Commissioner Val Arkoosh(D)
    vs.Ambassador Carla Sands(R)
    vs.Lt. Gov. John Fetterman(D)
    vs.State Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta(D)
    vs.Past Congressional candidate & political commentator Kathy Barnette(R)
    vs.State senator; son of former mayor Sharif Street(D)
    vs.Congressman Conor Lamb(D)
    vs.Candidate in 2020 House race Sean Parnell(R)
    SC: Incumbent Tim Scott(R)
    vs.State Rep. Krystle Matthews(D)
    SD: Incumbent John Thune(R)
    vs.State Rep. Billie Sutton(? D)
    UT: Incumbent Mike Lee(R)
    vs.Challenger Allen Glines(D)
    vs.Challenger Austin Searle(D)
    VT: Incumbent Patrick Leahy(D)
    vs.Lt.Gov. David Zuckerman(? D)
    WA: Incumbent Patty Murray(D)
    vs.Challenger Tiffany Smiley(R)
    WI: Incumbent Ron Johnson(R)
    vs.County Exec. Tom Nelson(D)
    vs.Treasurer Sarah Godlewski(D)
    vs.Sports Exec. Alex Lasry(D)
    vs.State senator Chris Larson(D)
    vs.Lt.Gov.Mandela Barnes(D)
    Abortion
    Budget/Economy
    Civil Rights
    Corporations
    Crime
    Drugs
    Education
    Energy/Oil
    Environment
    Families
    Foreign Policy
    Free Trade
    Govt. Reform
    Gun Control
    Health Care
    Homeland Security
    Immigration
    Jobs
    Principles
    Social Security
    Tax Reform
    Technology
    War/Peace
    Welfare

    Other Senators
    Senate Votes (analysis)
    Bill Sponsorships
    Affiliations
    Policy Reports
    Group Ratings

    Contact info:
    Email Contact Form
    Phone number:
    (202) 224-6621
    Search for...





    Page last updated: Aug 29, 2021