|
| |
|
This page contains excerpts from government reports, signed by elected officials.
Each intelligence agency has its own security practices, outgrowths of the Cold War. We certainly understand the reason for these practices. Counterintelligence concerns are still real, even if the old Soviet enemy has been replaced by other spies. But the security concerns need to be weighed against the costs. Current security requirements nurture overclassification and excessive compartmentation of information among agencies. Each agency’s incentive structure opposes sharing, with risks (criminal, civil, and internal administrative sanctions) but few rewards for sharing information. No one has to pay the long-term costs of overclassifying information, though these costs—even in literal financial terms— are substantial. There are no punishments for not sharing information.
Agencies uphold a “need-to-know” culture of information protection rather than promoting a “need-to-share” culture of integration. Recommendation: Information procedures should provide incentives for sharing, to restore a better balance between security and shared knowledge. Recommendation: The president should lead the government-wide effort to bring the major national security institutions into the information revolution. He should coordinate the resolution of the legal, policy, and technical issues across agencies to create a “trusted information network. ”
- Topic: Government Reform
- Headline: Replace "need-to-know" culture with "need-to-share"
- Key for participation codes:
- Sponsorships: p=sponsored; o=co-sponsored; s=signed
- Memberships: c=chair; m=member; e=endorsed; f=profiled; s=scored
- Resolutions: i=introduced; w=wrote; a=adopted
- Cases: w=wrote; j=joined; d=dissented; c=concurred
Independents
participating in 04-911-15 |
Total recorded by OnTheIssues:
Democrats:
3
Republicans:
3
Independents:
0 |
|
