OnTheIssuesLogo

Lisa Murkowski on Crime

Republican Jr Senator (AK)


Limit liability by capping non-economic damages

Q: Do you believe that limiting the liability of corporations or physicians for mistakes is necessary to curb rising medical costs?

KNOWLES: Just like I did as governor, I'll bring all parties together to figure out a way to reform the system while still protecting everyone's right to their day in court. Take the most famous case in Alaska history, the Exxon Valdez damages. The 32,000 injured Alaska private property owners, fishermen and Native villagers deserve their day in court.

MURKOWSKI: Limiting liability by capping non-economic damages is necessary to reduce medical costs. In Alaska, two of our four liability insurers left the state in the past year because of large liability damage awards. The result is higher insurance rates for doctors and higher rates for patients. If the trend continues, the ability for patients to access a doctor will decrease.

Source: [Xref Knowles] AK Senate Debate, Q&A by Daily News-Miner Oct 10, 2004

Funding to prosecute rape and sexual offenders

Responding to news reports that many Anchorage sexual assaults and rapist were not being prosecuted because of lack of funds Murkowski won $2 million in federal funds to assist the Anchorage Police Department and prosecutors in these efforts.
Source: Campaign website, LisaMurkowski.com Jun 30, 2004

$5M to fight domestic violence

Responding to the needs of battered women and children across Alaska , Murkowski secured $5 million for improvements in domestic violence shelters so that police have more tools to handle domestic situations.
Source: Campaign website, LisaMurkowski.com Jun 30, 2004

Supported Protect Act with mandatory sentences

Murkowski supported the federal Protect Act, tightening penalties for sexual offenders and implementing mandatory life sentences for twice-convicted sexual offenders, denying pretrial release for alleged child rapists or child abductors and extending the statute of limitations for child abductions and sex crimes to the life of the alleged victim. The law also expands the ability of prosecutors and police to obtain wiretaps for monitoring those suspected of sex crimes.
Source: Campaign website, LisaMurkowski.com Jun 30, 2004

End parole for repeat violent offenders

Source: 2002 Alaska State Legislative NPAT Jul 2, 2002

Voted YES on reinstating $1.15 billion funding for the COPS Program.

Amendment would increase funding for the COPS Program to $1.15 billion for FY 2008 to provide state and local law enforcement with critical resources. The funding is offset by an unallocated reduction to non-defense discretionary spending.

Proponents recommend voting YES because:

This amendment reinstates the COPS Program. I remind everyone, when the COPS Program was functioning, violent crime in America reduced 8.5% a year for 7 years in a row. Throughout the 1990s, we funded the COPS Program at roughly $1.2 billion, and it drove down crime. Now crime is rising again. The COPS Program in the crime bill worked, and the Government Accounting Office found a statistical link between the COPS grants and a reduction in crime. The Brookings Institution reported the COPS Program is one of the most cost-effective programs we have ever had in this country. Local officials urgently need this support.

Opponents recommend voting NO because:

The COPS Program has some history. It was started by President Clinton. He asked for 100,000 police officers. He said that when we got to 100,000, the program would stop. We got to 110,000 police officers and the program continues on and on and on.

This program should have ended 5 years ago or 6 years ago, but it continues. It is similar to so many Federal programs that get constituencies that go on well past what their original purpose was. It may be well intentioned, but we cannot afford it and we shouldn't continue it. It was never thought it would be continued this long.

Reference: Biden Amendment; Bill S.Amdt.529 on S.Con.Res.21 ; vote number 2007-110 on Mar 23, 2007

Rated 87% by the NCJA, indicating a "tough-on-crime" stance.

Murkowski scores 87% by the NCJA on crime issues

OnTheIssues.org interprets the 2005 NCJA scores as follows:

About the NCJA (from their website, www.ncja.org):

The National Criminal Justice Association (NCJA) exists to promote the development of justice systems in states, tribal nations, and units of local government that enhance public safety; prevent and reduce the harmful effects of criminal and delinquent behavior on victims, individuals and communities; adjudicate defendants and sanction offenders fairly and justly; and that are effective and efficient.

Toward this end, the Association:

Source: NCJA website 05n-NCJA on Dec 31, 2005

Other candidates on Crime: Lisa Murkowski on other issues:
AK Gubernatorial:
Sarah Palin
AK Senatorial:
Dave Cuddy
Ted Stevens


2008 Senate retirements:

Wayne Allard(R,CO)
Larry Craig(R,ID)
Pete Domenici(R,NM)
Chuck Hagel(R,NE)
Trent Lott(R,MS)
Craig Thomas(R,WY)
John Warner(R,VA)

2008 Presidential Contenders:

Chuck Baldwin(C)
Rep.Bob Barr(L)
Sen.Hillary Clinton(D)
Sen.Mike Gravel(L)
Alan Keyes(C)
Sen.John McCain(R)
Rep.Cynthia McKinney(G)
Ralph Nader(I)
Sen.Barack Obama(D)
Rep.Ron Paul(R)
2008 Senate Races:
AK:Stevens v.Begich v.Cuddy v.Sikma
AL:Sessions v.Figures
AR:Pryor v.Kennedy
CO:Schaffer v.Udall
DE:Biden v.O`Donnell
GA:Chambliss v.Cardwell v.Jones v.Buckley
IA:Harkin v.Reed
ID:Risch v.LaRocco
IL:Durbin v.Sauerberg v.Stafford
KS:Roberts v.Jones v.Slattery
KY:McConnell v.Lunsford
LA:Landrieu v.Kennedy
MA:Kerry v.O`Reilly v.Beatty
ME:Collins v.Allen
MI:Levin v.Hoogendyk
MN:Coleman v.Franken v.Ventura v.Cavlan v.Pallmeyer
MS4:Wicker v.Musgrove
MS6:Cochran v.Fleming
MT:Baucus v.Kelleher
NC:Dole v.Hagan
NE:Johanns v.Kleeb v.Raimondo v.Larrick
NH:Sununu v.Shaheen
NJ:Lautenberg v.Zimmer
NM:Wilson v.Pearce v.Udall
OR:Smith v.Merkley v.Brownlow
OK:Inhofe v.Rice
RI:Reed v.Young v.Tingley
SC:Graham v.Cone v.Conley v.McBride
SD:Johnson v.Dykstra
TN:Alexander v.Eaton v.Padgett v.Tuke v.Lugo
TX:Cornyn v.Noriega v.Jameson
VA:Gilmore v.Warner v.Marshall
WV:Rockefeller v.Wolfe
WY4:Barrasso v.Carter v.Goodenough
WY6:Enzi v.Rothfuss
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes
Bill Sponsorships
Affiliations
Policy Reports
Group Ratings

Page last updated: Jul 08, 2008